[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnm6rd4pOJvRbAghLxfd2QL5VJ+ODiMyRh1ri3pmmz0yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:07:51 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mtd-xip: work around clang/llvm bug
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:41 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:31 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> > llvm gets confused by inline asm with .rep directives,
>
> Are the LLVM developers aware of the bug?
> It seems like something we can work around but should
> eventually be fixed properly in LLVM, right?
Arnd filed the bug yesterday. I looked at it; so someone working on
LLVM is aware of it. The kernel is definitely exercising weak points
in our inline assembly support.
> > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42539
> I guess this brings up the old question whether the compiler should
> be worked around or just considered immature, but as it happens this
Definitely a balancing act; we prioritize work based on what's
feasible to work around vs must be implemented. A lot of my time is
going into validation of asm goto right now, but others are ramping up
on the integrated assembler (clang itself can be invoked as a
substitute for GNU AS; but there's not enough support to do `make
AS=clang` for the kernel just yet).
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists