lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:48:39 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, vireshk@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] cpufreq: qcom: Re-organise kryo cpufreq to use it
 for other nvmem based qcom socs

On 05-07-19, 11:57, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> -static struct platform_driver qcom_cpufreq_kryo_driver = {
> -	.probe = qcom_cpufreq_kryo_probe,
> -	.remove = qcom_cpufreq_kryo_remove,
> +static struct platform_driver qcom_cpufreq_driver = {
> +	.probe = qcom_cpufreq_probe,
> +	.remove = qcom_cpufreq_remove,
>  	.driver = {
> -		.name = "qcom-cpufreq-kryo",
> +		.name = "qcom-cpufreq",

Should we still name it "qcom-cpufreq-nvmem" here ? Only the string
here.

>  	},
>  };

-- 
viresh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ