linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: Do not lose last line in kmsg dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190710080402.ab3f4qfnvez6dhtc@axis.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:04:02 +0200
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        "sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Do not lose last line in kmsg dump

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:29:39PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2019-07-09 19:12:30, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (07/09/19 10:10), Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > > A dump of a 64-byte buffer filled by kmsg_dump_get_buffer(), before this
> > > patch:
> > > 
> > >  00000000: 3c 30 3e 5b 20 20 20 20 36 2e 35 32 32 31 39 37  <0>[    6.522197
> > >  00000010: 5d 20 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 0a  ] AAAAAAAAAAAAA.
> > >  00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > >  00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > > 
> > > After this patch:
> > > 
> > >  00000000: 3c 30 3e 5b 20 20 20 20 36 2e 34 32 37 35 30 32  <0>[    6.427502
> > >  00000010: 5d 20 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 0a  ] AAAAAAAAAAAAA.
> > >  00000020: 3c 30 3e 5b 20 20 20 20 36 2e 34 32 37 37 36 39  <0>[    6.427769
> > >  00000030: 5d 20 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 31 32 33 34 35 0a  ] BBBBBBBB12345.
> > 
> > [..]
> > 
> > > @@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ static size_t msg_print_text(const struct printk_log *msg, bool syslog,
> > >  		}
> > >  
> > >  		if (buf) {
> > > -			if (prefix_len + text_len + 1 >= size - len)
> > > +			if (prefix_len + text_len + 1 > size - len)
> > >  				break;
> > 
> > So with this patch the last byte of the buffer is 0xA. It's a bit
> > uncomfortable that `len', which we return from msg_print_text(),
> > now points one byte beyond the buffer:
> > 
> > 	buf[len++] = '\n';
> > 	return len;
> > 
> > This is not very common. Not sure what usually happens to kmsg_dump
> > buffers, but anyone who'd do a rather innocent
> > 
> > 	kmsg_dump(buf, &len);
> > 	buf[len] = 0x00;
> > 
> > will write to something which is not a kmsg buffer (in some cases).
> 
> I have the same worries.
> 
> On the other hand. The function does not store the trailing '\0'
> into the buffer itself. The callers would need to add it themself.
> It is their responsibility to avoid a buffer overflow.
> 
> I have checked several users and it seems that nobody adds or
> needs the trailing '\0'.
> 
> It is ugly to do not use the entire buffer just because theoretical
> buggy users.

All the callers of kmsg_dump_get_buffer() seem to be fine but these two
users of kmsg_dump_get_line(), which also calls msg_print_text(), have
exactly the code which you and Sergey worry about:

arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
2836:	while (kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock(&dumper, false, buf, sizeof(buf), &len)) {
2837-		buf[len] = '\0';

arch/um/kernel/kmsg_dump.c
29:	while (kmsg_dump_get_line(dumper, true, line, sizeof(line), &len)) {
30-		line[len] = '\0';

I guess we should fix these first and leave this patch as is?