lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190710101044.499cc273@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:10:44 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the vfs tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:50:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   51eae7431ded ("vfs: Kill mount_single()")
> 
> from the vfs tree and commit:
> 
>   af96c1e304f7 ("docs: filesystems: vfs: Convert vfs.txt to RST")
> 
> from the jc_docs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I removed the file and added the following merge fix patch)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:48:39 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: vfs: update for "vfs: Kill mount_single()"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> index 0f85ab21c2ca..a65ee69f02d1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/vfs.rst
> @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ and provides a fill_super() callback instead.  The generic variants are:
>  ``mount_nodev``
>  	mount a filesystem that is not backed by a device
>  
> -``mount_single``
> -	mount a filesystem which shares the instance between all mounts
> +``vfs_get_super``
> +	mount a filesystem with one of a number of superblock sharing options.
>  
>  A fill_super() callback implementation has the following arguments:
>  

This is now a conflict between the vfs tree and linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ