[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fa1fa6998332642c49e2d5209193ffe2713f333.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:17:31 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] treewide: Fix GENMASK misuses
On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 22:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> These GENMASK uses are inverted argument order and the
> actual masks produced are incorrect. Fix them.
>
> Add checkpatch tests to help avoid more misuses too.
>
> Joe Perches (12):
> checkpatch: Add GENMASK tests
IMHO this doesn't make a lot of sense as a checkpatch test - just throw
in a BUILD_BUG_ON()?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists