linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86/topology changes for v5.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1ad2de95e694a29909801d022fe2d556df9a4bd5.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:27:53 +0800
From:   Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        xry111@...gyan1223.wang
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/topology changes for v5.3

On 2019-07-09 17:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 01:17:11AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > That still does not explain the cr4/0 issue you have. Can you send me your
> > > .config please?
> > 
> > Does your machine have UMIP support? None of my test boxes has. So that'd
> > be the difference of bits enforced in CR4. Should not matter because it's
> > User mode instruction prevention, but who knows.
> 
> Ew. Yeah, I don't have i9 nor i7 for testing this. I did try everything
> else I had (and hibernation). Is only Linus able to reproduce this so far?

I can, too.

> To rule out (in?) UMIP, this would remove UMIP from the pinning:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> index 309b6b9b49d4..f3beedb6da8a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static void __init setup_cr_pinning(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long mask;
>  
> -	mask = (X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_UMIP);
> +	mask = (X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_SMAP);
>  	cr4_pinned_bits = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.cr4) & mask;
>  	static_key_enable(&cr_pinning.key);
>  }

I'll try it.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University