linux-kernel - Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf: use usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190710141200.GN657710@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:12:00 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
Cc:     openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH] ipmi_si_intf: use usleep_range()
 instead of busy looping

Hello, Corey.

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:07:03PM -0500, Corey Minyard wrote:
> I believe the change was 33979734cd35ae "IPMI: use schedule in kthread"
> The original change that added the kthread was a9a2c44ff0a1350
> "ipmi: add timer thread".
> 
> I mis-remembered this, we switched from doing a udelay() to
> schedule(), but that udelay was 1us, so that's probably not helpful
> information.

I see, so it went from non-yielding busy looping to an yiedling one.
And, yeah, udelay(1) isn't much of a data point.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun