lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190710141500.GQ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:15:00 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cputime: remove duplicate code in
 account_process_tick

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:01:00PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> In funcation account_process_tick, func actually do same things with
> irqtime_account_process_tick, whenever if IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING set or
> if sched_clock_irqtime enabled.
> 
> So it's better to reuse one function for both.

But it's not the exact same.. and you didn't say, not did you say why
that is fine.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ