linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:52:17 +0000
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>
CC:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:43:46AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 01:56:36PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c: In function 'siw_create_listen':
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:1978:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'for_ifa'; did you mean 'fork_idle'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >    for_ifa(in_dev)
> >    ^~~~~~~
> >    fork_idle
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:1978:18: error: expected ';' before '{' token
> >    for_ifa(in_dev)
> >                   ^
> >                   ;
> >    {
> >    ~
> >
> > Caused by commit
> >
> >   6c52fdc244b5 ("rdma/siw: connection management")
> >
> > from the rdma tree.  I don't know why this didn't fail after I mereged
> > that tree.
> 
> I had the same question, because I have this fix for a couple of days already.
> 
> From 56c9e15ec670af580daa8c3ffde9503af3042d67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2019 10:43:42 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup to build SIW issue
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> index 8e618cb7261f..c883bf514341 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> @@ -1954,6 +1954,7 @@ static void siw_drop_listeners(struct iw_cm_id *id)
>  int siw_create_listen(struct iw_cm_id *id, int backlog)
>  {
>  	struct net_device *dev = to_siw_dev(id->device)->netdev;
> +	const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
>  	int rv = 0, listeners = 0;
> 
>  	siw_dbg(id->device, "id 0x%p: backlog %d\n", id, backlog);
> @@ -1975,8 +1976,7 @@ int siw_create_listen(struct iw_cm_id *id, int backlog)
>  			id, &s_laddr.sin_addr, ntohs(s_laddr.sin_port),
>  			&s_raddr->sin_addr, ntohs(s_raddr->sin_port));
> 
> -		for_ifa(in_dev)
> -		{
> +		in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu(ifa, in_dev) {
>  			if (ipv4_is_zeronet(s_laddr.sin_addr.s_addr) ||

Hum. There is no rcu lock held here and we can't use RCU anyhow as
siw_listen_address will sleep.

I think this needs to use rtnl, as below. Bernard, please urgently
confirm. Thanks

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
index 8e618cb7261f62..ee98e96a5bfaba 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
@@ -1965,6 +1965,7 @@ int siw_create_listen(struct iw_cm_id *id, int backlog)
 	 */
 	if (id->local_addr.ss_family == AF_INET) {
 		struct in_device *in_dev = in_dev_get(dev);
+		const struct in_ifaddr *ifa;
 		struct sockaddr_in s_laddr, *s_raddr;
 
 		memcpy(&s_laddr, &id->local_addr, sizeof(s_laddr));
@@ -1975,8 +1976,8 @@ int siw_create_listen(struct iw_cm_id *id, int backlog)
 			id, &s_laddr.sin_addr, ntohs(s_laddr.sin_port),
 			&s_raddr->sin_addr, ntohs(s_raddr->sin_port));
 
-		for_ifa(in_dev)
-		{
+		rtnl_lock();
+		in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl(ifa, in_dev) {
 			if (ipv4_is_zeronet(s_laddr.sin_addr.s_addr) ||
 			    s_laddr.sin_addr.s_addr == ifa->ifa_address) {
 				s_laddr.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_address;
@@ -1988,7 +1989,7 @@ int siw_create_listen(struct iw_cm_id *id, int backlog)
 					listeners++;
 			}
 		}
-		endfor_ifa(in_dev);
+		rtnl_unlock();
 		in_dev_put(in_dev);
 	} else if (id->local_addr.ss_family == AF_INET6) {
 		struct inet6_dev *in6_dev = in6_dev_get(dev);