[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190710145744.7279b355@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:57:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
chang-an.chen@...iatek.com, mingo@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tsoni@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: sched_clock and device suspend/resume
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 20:35:32 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > [ Resending as your Cc was screwed up and caused my reply to mess up
> > the Cc list ]
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:20:37 -0700
> > Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Another option is printing the epoch/cycles information in every print
> > > statement similar to thread id or processor id added
> > > recently(CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER). This can be avoided if we start
> > > accounting suspend time in sched_clock.
> >
> > Or another option is add a new clock that printk and tracing can use.
> > tracing already can switch between clocks trivially.
> >
> > sched_clock_continuous() ? (I know, horrible name), that simply keeps
> > track of the time delta at suspend and returns:
> >
> > sched_clock() + delta;
>
> Which you get already when you do
>
> # echo boot > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_clock
>
So basically the answer here is to change printk to use
ktime_get_boot_fast_ns() instead of local_clock()?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists