[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATx30AhZ51xozde=nO06-8UzuC0M9nfZXrqkyfmEFdu5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:59:30 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Cc: Shuah Khan" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
Tim Bird <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, wfg@...ux.intel.com,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/18] kbuild: enable building KUnit
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:34 PM Brendan Higgins
<brendanhiggins@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> KUnit is a new unit testing framework for the kernel and when used is
> built into the kernel as a part of it. Add KUnit to the root Kconfig and
> Makefile to allow it to be actually built.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
> ---
> Kconfig | 2 ++
> Makefile | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
> index 48a80beab6853..10428501edb78 100644
> --- a/Kconfig
> +++ b/Kconfig
> @@ -30,3 +30,5 @@ source "crypto/Kconfig"
> source "lib/Kconfig"
>
> source "lib/Kconfig.debug"
> +
> +source "kunit/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 3e4868a6498b2..60cf4f0813e0d 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ endif
> PHONY += prepare0
>
> ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
> -core-y += kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/
> +core-y += kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/ kunit/
>
> vmlinux-dirs := $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, $(init-y) $(init-m) \
> $(core-y) $(core-m) $(drivers-y) $(drivers-m) \
> --
> 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog
This is so trivial, and do not need to get ack from me.
Just a nit.
When CONFIG_KUNIT is disable, is there any point in descending into kunit/ ?
core-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += kunit/
... might be useful to skip kunit/ entirely.
If you look at the top-level Makefile, some entries are doing this:
init-y := init/
drivers-y := drivers/ sound/
drivers-$(CONFIG_SAMPLES) += samples/
drivers-$(CONFIG_KERNEL_HEADER_TEST) += include/
net-y := net/
libs-y := lib/
core-y := usr/
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists