linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix missed PMD wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190711074859.GA8727@quack2.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 09:48:59 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Boaz Harrosh <openosd@...il.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Robert Barror <robert.barror@...el.com>,
        Seema Pandit <seema.pandit@...el.com>,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix missed PMD wakeups

On Wed 10-07-19 20:08:55, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -848,7 +853,7 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct xa_state *xas, struct dax_device *dax_dev,
> >  	if (unlikely(dax_is_locked(entry))) {
> >  		void *old_entry = entry;
> >  
> > -		entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas);
> > +		entry = get_unlocked_entry(xas, 0);
> >  
> >  		/* Entry got punched out / reallocated? */
> >  		if (!entry || WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_is_value(entry)))
> 
> I'm not sure about this one.  Are we sure there will never be a dirty
> PMD entry?  Even if we can't create one today, it feels like a bit of
> a landmine to leave for someone who creates one in the future.

I was thinking about this but dax_writeback_one() doesn't really care what
entry it gets. Yes, in theory it could get a PMD when previously there was
PTE or vice-versa but we check that PFN's match and if they really do
match, there's no harm in doing the flushing whatever entry we got back...
And the checks are simpler this way.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR