lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190711094446.mdmjlcsnorluzy5h@earth.universe>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:44:46 +0200
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the pci tree

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:14:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:55:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the battery tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   Documentation/power/power_supply_class.txt
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   151f4e2bdc7a ("docs: power: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst")
> > 
> > from the pci tree and commit:
> > 
> >   49c9cd95bb6d ("power: supply: add input power and voltage limit properties")
> > 
> > from the battery tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I deleted the file and adde the following merge fix patch)
> > and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> > is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 13:52:44 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] power: supply: update for conversion to .rst
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/power/power_supply_class.rst | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/power/power_supply_class.rst b/Documentation/power/power_supply_class.rst
> > index 3f2c3fe38a61..883b2ef63119 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/power/power_supply_class.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/power/power_supply_class.rst
> > @@ -166,6 +166,14 @@ INPUT_CURRENT_LIMIT
> >    input current limit programmed by charger. Indicates
> >    the current drawn from a charging source.
> >  
> > +INPUT_VOLTAGE_LIMIT
> > +  input voltage limit programmed by charger. Indicates
> > +  the voltage limit from a charging source.
> > +
> > +INPUT_POWER_LIMIT
> > +  input power limit programmed by charger. Indicates
> > +  the power limit from a charging source.
> > +
> >  CHARGE_CONTROL_LIMIT
> >    current charge control limit setting
> >  CHARGE_CONTROL_LIMIT_MAX
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> 
> I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
> Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

Yes - your solution is correct and I will forward the information to
Linus, thanks.

(Sorry for the delayed reply, lot's of work these days)

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ