linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add i3c basic support for LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190711124402.GC3452@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:44:02 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>
Cc:     "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "bbrezillon@...rnel.org" <bbrezillon@...rnel.org>,
        "Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add i3c basic support for
 LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR

> From: Vitor Soares <soares@...opsys.com>
> Date: Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:12:34
> 
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> > 
> > From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 20:44:05
> > 
> > > > For today the st_lsm6dsx driver support LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR sensor only in
> > > > spi and i2c mode.
> > > > 
> > > > The LSM6DSO and LSM6DSR are also i3c capable so lets give i3c support to
> > > > them.
> > > 
> > > Hi Vitor,
> > > 
> > > just few comments inline.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Lorenzo
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...opsys.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > >   Remove unnecessary st_lsm6dsx_i3c_data table used to hold device name
> > > >   Use st_lsm6dsx_probe new form
> > > > 
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > >   Add support for LSM6DSR
> > > >   Set pm_ops to st_lsm6dsx_pm_ops
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/Kconfig          |  8 +++-
> > > >  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/Makefile         |  1 +
> > > >  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_i3c.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_i3c.c
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > > +static int st_lsm6dsx_i3c_probe(struct i3c_device *i3cdev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	const struct i3c_device_id *id = i3c_device_match_id(i3cdev,
> > > > +							    st_lsm6dsx_i3c_ids);
> > > 
> > > i3c_device_match_id can theoretically fail so is it better to check
> > > return value here? (maybe I am too paranoid :))
> 
> I was preparing the patch and if the i3c_device_match_id() fail it return 
> NULL so the st_lsm6dsx_probe() will fail automatically.
> Checking the spi_get_device_id(), the drivers don't test the return value 
> too.

multiple drivers deference it directly so I am fine to skip this check.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Do you think it is really necessary to test it before the 
> st_lsm6dsx_probe() function?
> 
> Best regards,
> Vitor Soares

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)