[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+mAd=US3cbNQexFGrLxhkSyqi2XyGetyHrZV6QMd69EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:44:31 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ryan Chen <ryanchen.aspeed@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: Document Aspeed SD controller
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 6:56 PM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, at 01:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 8:16 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > The ASPEED SD/SDIO/eMMC controller exposes two slots implementing the
> > > SDIO Host Specification v2.00, with 1 or 4 bit data buses, or an 8 bit
> > > data bus if only a single slot is enabled.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/mmc/sdhci-of-aspeed.yaml | 91 +++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > aspeed,sdhci.yaml
>
> Ack. Previously I had separate documents for different compatibles, wasn't sure
> how to tackle name one document covering multiple compatibles.
>
> >
> > > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-of-aspeed.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-of-aspeed.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-of-aspeed.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..e98a2ac4d46d
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-of-aspeed.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> >
> > The preferred license is (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) if that is okay with you.
>
> I should poke people internally again, I had asked, just haven't got a clear
> answer. What was the justification for the preference (just so I can pass that
> on)?
To use schema in non-GPL projects. *BSD, Zephyr, etc.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists