[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <23e06fc0-b969-44e9-a44d-f11b19dfdeca@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 07:41:01 -0700
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: wen.yang99@....com.cn, Markus.Elfring@....de, julia.lawall@...6.fr
Cc: wang.yi59@....com.cn, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oss@...error.net, paulus@...ba.org,
xue.zhihong@....com.cn, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
cheng.shengyu@....com.cn
Subject: Re: Coccinelle: Checking of_node_put() calls with SmPL
On 07/10/2019 11:35 PM, wen.yang99@....com.cn wrote:
>>> we developed a coccinelle script to detect such problems.
>>
>> Would you find the implementation of the function “dt_init_idle_driver”
>> suspicious according to discussed source code search patterns?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c?id=e9a83bd2322035ed9d7dcf35753d3f984d76c6a5#n208
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2/source/drivers/cpuidle/dt_idle_states.c#L208
>>
>>
>>> This script is still being improved.
>>
>> Will corresponding software development challenges become more interesting?
>
> Hello Markus,
> This is the simplified code pattern for it:
>
> 172 for (i = 0; ; i++) {
This loop can only be exited on a break.
> 173 state_node = of_parse_phandle(...); ---> Obtain here
> ...
> 177 match_id = of_match_node(matches, state_node);
> 178 if (!match_id) {
> 179 err = -ENODEV;
> 180 break; ---> Jump out of the loop without releasing it
> 181 }
> 182
> 183 if (!of_device_is_available(state_node)) {
> 184 of_node_put(state_node);
> 185 continue; ---> Release the object references within a loop
> 186 }
> ...
> 208 of_node_put(state_node); --> Release the object references within a loop
This is required at the end of every loop or continue to free the reference.
Only a break will exit the loop where we hit the below of_node_put().
> 209 }
> 210
> 211 of_node_put(state_node); --> There may be double free here.
None of the break conditions call of_node_put(), so it needs to be called here.
-Tyrel
>
> This code pattern is very interesting and the coccinelle software should also recognize this pattern.
>
> Regards,
> Wen
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists