[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkubvsRCnJKCaesB=PF=DgXfsBzwzR8kyE9NzWPU8Gehg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:14:10 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Huw Davies <huw@...eweavers.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsyscall: use __iter_div_u64_rem()
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 5:28 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> clang does not like an inline assembly with a "=q" contraint for
> a 64-bit output:
Seems like starting in GCC 7, GCC may not like it either:
https://godbolt.org/z/UyBUfh
it simply warns then proceeds with code gen. Another difference may
come from when GCC vs Clang perform dead code elimination (DCE) vs
semantic analysis.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists