[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190711131344.452fc064@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Hi Jason,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a
> > dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and
> > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-next
> > tree :-(
>
> ? I'm confused..
>
> rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!)
I have "Fixup to build SIW issue" from Leon (which switches to using
in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu) included in the rmda tree merge commit because
without that the rdma tree would not build for me. Are you saying that
I don't need that at all, now?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists