linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1212628880.41065287.1562870277331.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:37:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        dan j williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        yuval shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        cohuck@...hat.com, lcapitulino@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning



> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 07:57:00PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch fixes below sparse warning related to __virtio
> > type in virtio pmem driver. This is reported by Intel test
> > bot on linux-next tree.
> > 
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base
> > types)
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] type
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28:    got restricted __virtio32
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different base
> > types)
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59:    expected restricted __virtio32 [usertype] val
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59:    got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ret
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > This fixes a warning, so submitting it as a separate
> > patch on top of virtio pmem series.
> >  
> >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > index efcd72f2d20d..f89129bf1f84 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> > @@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ struct virtio_pmem_config {
> >  
> >  struct virtio_pmem_resp {
> >  	/* Host return status corresponding to flush request */
> > -	__u32 ret;
> > +	__virtio32 ret;
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct virtio_pmem_req {
> >  	/* command type */
> > -	__u32 type;
> > +	__virtio32 type;
> >  };
> >  
> >  #endif
> 
> req/resp are in memory right?
> Then this looks like a wrong fix.
> The accessors should all use cpu_to/from_le
> and they types should be __le32.

o.k

> 
> > --
> > 2.20.1
>