[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09fee00d-37a6-0895-7964-0e8a2d5b17d6@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:41:59 +0200
From: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com, liran.alon@...cle.com,
jwadams@...gle.com, graf@...zon.de, rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/26] mm/asi: Abort isolation on interrupt, exception
and context switch
On 7/11/19 10:17 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:11:43PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com> writes:
>>> jmp paranoid_exit
>>> @@ -1182,6 +1196,16 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_entry)
>>> xorl %ebx, %ebx
>>>
>>> 1:
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ADDRESS_SPACE_ISOLATION
>>> + /*
>>> + * If address space isolation is active then abort it and return
>>> + * the original kernel CR3 in %r14.
>>> + */
>>> + ASI_START_ABORT_ELSE_JUMP 2f
>>> + movq %rdi, %r14
>>> + ret
>>> +2:
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Unless I missed it you don't map the exception stacks into ASI, so it
>> has likely already triple faulted at this point.
>
> The exception stacks are in the CPU entry area, aren't they?
>
That's my understanding, stacks come from tss in the CPU entry area and
the CPU entry area is part for the core ASI mappings (see patch 15/26).
alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists