[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190711232247.GH19023@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:22:47 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Cristina Moraru <cristina.moraru09@...il.com>,
"vegard.nossum@...il.com" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
backports@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"rafael.j.wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Daniel Jonsson <danijons@...dent.chalmers.se>,
Andrzej Wasowski <wasowski@....dk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Add CONFIG symbol as module attribute
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:07:27PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 3:25 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:57:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > But again, this is a separate problem. The one I am addressing, on
> > behalf of Cristina, is a subspace, dedicated towards *hardware*
> > functionality.
>
> Hmm...maybe this isn't what I am looking for then. I am interested in
> the problem of figuring out what dependencies I need to select to turn
> on a desired config symbol (which is obviously a separate issue),
It isn't directly. the problem statement is different, and
for that I do recommend checking out the kconfig-sat effort.
It only indirectly relates in that we already know our kconfig
semantics need work, and I do think that the underlying problem
in this thread slowly strives towards addressing kconfig semantics
for modules, associating one main kconfig symbol with one module.
I have no evidence for this though. But since there are users who can
gain from it, I don't see any issues from embracing it.
> and
> I am interested in associating symbols with a config symbol and then
> ensuring that symbol is exercised. Basically, I want a way to make
> sure my tests actually get run without a human looking at them; I feel
> like what you are working on might help with this latter issue, but I
> am not 100% sure. It sounds like it is not your primary goal in any
> case.
Nope, this topic only ralates to yours in the semantics case.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists