lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz
Cc:     jon.maloy@...csson.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        ying.xue@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tipc: ensure head->lock is initialised

From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:41:15 +1200

> tipc_named_node_up() creates a skb list. It passes the list to
> tipc_node_xmit() which has some code paths that can call
> skb_queue_purge() which relies on the list->lock being initialised.
> 
> The spin_lock is only needed if the messages end up on the receive path
> but when the list is created in tipc_named_node_up() we don't
> necessarily know if it is going to end up there.
> 
> Once all the skb list users are updated in tipc it will then be possible
> to update them to use the unlocked variants of the skb list functions
> and initialise the lock when we know the message will follow the receive
> path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>

Applied.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ