[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r26ug6qg.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:42:31 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Lendacky\, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files
[ Cc'ing Tom Lendacky which I forgot to do earlier. Sorry about that. ]
Hello Christoph,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:
> Honestly I think this code should go away without any replacement.
> There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just
> for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA
> mask.
Makes sense. I'll submit a v2 which just removes this code.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists