[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYMOyKo2vXY8bO448ikmdGioK3s5JMZLz6c2y8ObPm4zHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:43:38 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 00:52, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 08:02:34PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Current trusted keys framework is tightly coupled to use TPM device as
> > an underlying implementation which makes it difficult for implementations
> > like Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) etc. to provide trusked keys
> > support in case platform doesn't posses a TPM device.
> >
> > So this patch tries to add generic trusted keys framework where underlying
> > implemtations like TPM, TEE etc. could be easily plugged-in.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> 1. Needs to be somehow dissected into digestable/reviewable pieces.
Sure, will try to split this patch in next version.
> 2. As a precursory step probably would make sense to move all
> existing trusted keys code into one subsystem first.
Okay.
-Sumit
>
> /Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists