[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190712053631.9814-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:36:28 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Anderson <andmike@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Remove x86-specific code from generic headers
Hello,
Both powerpc¹ and s390² are adding <asm/mem_encrypt.h> headers. Currently,
they have to supply definitions for functions and macros which only have a
meaning on x86: sme_me_mask, sme_active() and sev_active().
Christoph Hellwig made a suggestion to "clean up the Kconfig and generic
headers bits for memory encryption so that we don't need all this
boilerplate code", and this is what this series does.
After this patch set, this is powerpc's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>:
#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_MEM_ENCRYPT_H
#define _ASM_POWERPC_MEM_ENCRYPT_H
#include <asm/svm.h>
static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void)
{
return is_secure_guest();
}
static inline bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
{
return is_secure_guest();
}
int set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
int set_memory_decrypted(unsigned long addr, int numpages);
#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_MEM_ENCRYPT_H */
I don't have a way to test SME nor SEV, so the patches have only been build
tested. They assume the presence of the following two commits:
Commit 4eb5fec31e61 ("fs/proc/vmcore: Enable dumping of encrypted memory
when SEV was active"), which is now in Linus' master branch;
Commit e67a5ed1f86f ("dma-direct: Force unencrypted DMA under SME for
certain DMA masks"), which is in dma-mapping/for-next and comes from this
patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/10b83d9ff31bca88e94da2ff34e30619eb396078.1562785123.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com/
Thiago Jung Bauermann (3):
x86/Kconfig: Move ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT to arch/Kconfig
DMA mapping: Move SME handling to x86-specific files
fs/core/vmcore: Move sev_active() reference to x86 arch code
arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 ++---
arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 7 +++++++
arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 10 ++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/crash_dump_64.c | 5 +++++
fs/proc/vmcore.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/crash_dump.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 15 +--------------
kernel/dma/Kconfig | 3 +++
kernel/dma/mapping.c | 4 ++--
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +--
11 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
--
¹ https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190521044912.1375-12-bauerman@linux.ibm.com/
² https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20190612111236.99538-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists