linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pv: Fix a boot up hang revealed by int3 self test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:06:26 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        x86@...nel.org, srinivas.eeda@...cle.com,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pv: Fix a boot up hang revealed by int3 self test

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:15:21PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> index 4722ba2..2138d69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c
> @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ struct trap_array_entry {
>  
>  static struct trap_array_entry trap_array[] = {
>  	{ debug,                       xen_xendebug,                    true },
> -	{ int3,                        xen_xenint3,                     true },
> +	{ int3,                        xen_int3,                        true },
>  	{ double_fault,                xen_double_fault,                true },
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
>  	{ machine_check,               xen_machine_check,               true },

I'm confused on the purpose of trap_array[], could you elucidate me?

The sole user seems to be get_trap_addr() and that talks about ISTs, but
#BP isn't an IST anymore, so why does it have ist_okay=true?