[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5a73063fe855e027623c211e6ea5c7d20a27a04.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:21:56 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, "# 4.0+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Vadim Sukhomlinov <sukhomlinov@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Fix TPM 1.2 Shutdown sequence to prevent future
TPM operations
On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 13:50 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> But the sysfs comment means I should not apply this backport then?
>
> Totally confused by this long thread, sorry.
>
> What am I supposed to do for the stable trees here?
I'll work out a proper patch set for stable kernels with necessary
patches and cover letter with a brief summary in the week starting
29th of this month when I come back from vacation.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists