lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:45:25 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Bernard Metzler <BMT@...ich.ibm.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] rdma/siw: avoid smp_store_mb() on a u64

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 05:40:43PM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote:
 
> It is because there are two levels a CQ can be armed:
> 
>        #include <infiniband/verbs.h>
> 
>        int ibv_req_notify_cq(struct ibv_cq *cq, int solicited_only);
> 
> If we kick the CQ handler, we have to clear the whole
> thing. The user later again decides how he wants to get it
> re-armed...SOLICITED completions only, or ALL signaled.

Arrange it so only one of the two bits is ever set and do two
test-and-set bits when a SOLICITED CQE comes in?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ