[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907131230280.246128@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
cc: mhocko@...e.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: document kmemleak's non-blockable
__GFP_NOFAIL case
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, Yang Shi wrote:
> When running ltp's oom test with kmemleak enabled, the below warning was
> triggerred since kernel detects __GFP_NOFAIL & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is
> passed in:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 105 PID: 2138 at mm/page_alloc.c:4608 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50
> Modules linked in: loop dax_pmem dax_pmem_core
> ip_tables x_tables xfs virtio_net net_failover virtio_blk failover
> ata_generic virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio libata
> CPU: 105 PID: 2138 Comm: oom01 Not tainted 5.2.0-next-20190710+ #7
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x1c31/0x1d50
> ...
> kmemleak_alloc+0x4e/0xb0
> kmem_cache_alloc+0x2a7/0x3e0
> ? __kmalloc+0x1d6/0x470
> ? ___might_sleep+0x9c/0x170
> ? mempool_alloc+0x2b0/0x2b0
> mempool_alloc_slab+0x2d/0x40
> mempool_alloc+0x118/0x2b0
> ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
> ? mempool_resize+0x390/0x390
> ? lock_downgrade+0x3c0/0x3c0
> bio_alloc_bioset+0x19d/0x350
> ? __swap_duplicate+0x161/0x240
> ? bvec_alloc+0x1b0/0x1b0
> ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
> ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
> get_swap_bio+0x80/0x230
> ? __x64_sys_madvise+0x50/0x50
> ? end_swap_bio_read+0x310/0x310
> ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
> ? check_chain_key+0x24e/0x300
> ? bdev_write_page+0x55/0x130
> __swap_writepage+0x5ff/0xb20
>
> The mempool_alloc_slab() clears __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, kmemleak has
> __GFP_NOFAIL set all the time due to commit
> d9570ee3bd1d4f20ce63485f5ef05663866fe6c0 ("kmemleak: allow to coexist
> with fault injection").
>
It only clears __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM provisionally to see if the allocation
would immediately succeed before falling back to the elements in the
mempool. If that fails, and the mempool is empty, mempool_alloc()
attempts the allocation with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. So for the problem
described here, I think what we really want is this:
diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ void *mempool_alloc(mempool_t *pool, gfp_t gfp_mask)
gfp_mask |= __GFP_NORETRY; /* don't loop in __alloc_pages */
gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOWARN; /* failures are OK */
- gfp_temp = gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|__GFP_IO);
+ gfp_temp = gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|__GFP_IO|__GFP_NOFAIL);
repeat_alloc:
But bio_alloc_bioset() plays with gfp_mask itself: are we sure that it
isn't the one clearing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM itself before falling back to
saved_gfp?
In other words do we also want this?
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -462,16 +462,16 @@ struct bio *bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int nr_iovecs,
* We solve this, and guarantee forward progress, with a rescuer
* workqueue per bio_set. If we go to allocate and there are
* bios on current->bio_list, we first try the allocation
- * without __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM; if that fails, we punt those
- * bios we would be blocking to the rescuer workqueue before
- * we retry with the original gfp_flags.
+ * without __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM or __GFP_NOFAIL; if that fails,
+ * we punt those bios we would be blocking to the rescuer
+ * workqueue before we retry with the original gfp_flags.
*/
-
if (current->bio_list &&
(!bio_list_empty(¤t->bio_list[0]) ||
!bio_list_empty(¤t->bio_list[1])) &&
bs->rescue_workqueue)
- gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
+ gfp_mask &= ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM |
+ __GFP_NOFAIL);
p = mempool_alloc(&bs->bio_pool, gfp_mask);
if (!p && gfp_mask != saved_gfp) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists