linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: new features for 5.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190713040728.GB5347@magnolia>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:07:28 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: new features for 5.3

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 05:27:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:02 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The branch merges cleanly against this morning's HEAD and survived an
> > overnight run of xfstests.  The merge was completely straightforward, so
> > please let me know if you run into anything weird.
> 
> Hmm. I don't know what you merged against, but it got a (fairly
> trivial) conflict for me due to
> 
>   79d08f89bb1b ("block: fix .bi_size overflow")
> 
> from the block merge (from Tuesday) touching a line next to one changed by
> 
>   a24737359667 ("xfs: simplify xfs_chain_bio")
> 
> from this pull.
> 
> So it wasn't an entirely clean merge for me.
> 
> Was it a complex merge conflict? No. I'm just confused by the "merges
> cleanly against this morning's HEAD", which makes me wonder what you
> tried to merge against..

Doh, it turns out I was merging against the same HEAD as my last two
pull requests because I forgot to re-pull.  Sorry about that.  It's been
too long of a week. :/

--D

>             Linus