linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Do not lose last line in kmsg buffer dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190713060300.GA1038@tigerII.localdomain>
Date:   Sat, 13 Jul 2019 15:03:00 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <rabinv@...s.com>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Do not lose last line in kmsg buffer dump

On (07/12/19 15:11), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Looks correct to me as well.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> 
> The patch has been committed into printk.git, branch for-5.3-fixes.
> 
> I am still a bit undecided whether to send pull request the following
> week or wait for 5.4. On one hand, it is very old bug (since 3.5).
> On the other hand, I think that it was not reported/fixed earlier
> only because it was hard to notice. And loosing the very last message
> is quite pity.

My call would be - let's wait till next merge window.

	-ss