[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190714160908.7443eca6@archlinux>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 16:09:08 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: gyroadc: fix uninitialized return code
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 21:55:58 +0200
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> > >> This is correct but missing that the above 'return ret' is broken, too.
> > >> ret is initialized but 0 in that case.
> > >
> > > Nice catch! Oh well, given enough eyeballs, ...
> >
> > I don't think ret is initialized, reg is, not ret .
>
> It is initialized for the broken 'return ret' *above* the one which gets
> rightfully fixed in this patch.
>
Agreed, 2 broken cases and this is only fixing the second one.
I'm expecting a v2 of this patch which fixes them both, so
won't apply this v1.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists