linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] erofs: promote erofs from staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <63b9eaca-5d4b-0fe2-c861-7531977a5b48@aol.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:17:27 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@....com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] erofs: promote erofs from staging

Hi Pavel,

On 2019/7/14 18:49, Pavel Machek Wrote:
> On Thu 2019-07-11 22:57:31, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Changelog from v1:
>>  o resend the whole filesystem into a patchset suggested by Greg;
>>  o code is more cleaner, especially for decompression frontend.
>>
>> --8<----------
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> EROFS file system has been in Linux-staging for about a year.
>> It has been proved to be stable enough to move out of staging
>> by 10+ millions of HUAWEI Android mobile phones on the market
>> from EMUI 9.0.1, and it was promoted as one of the key features
>> of EMUI 9.1 [1], including P30(pro).
> 
> Ok, maybe it is ready to be moved to kernel proper, but as git can
> do moves, would it be better to do it as one commit?
> 
> Separate patches are still better for review, I guess.

Thanks for you reply. Either form is OK for me... The first step could
be that I hope someone could kindly take some time to look into these
patches... :)

The patch v2 is slightly different for the current code in the staging
tree since I did some code cleanup these days (mainly renaming / moving,
including rename unzip_vle.{c,h} to zdata.{c,h} and some confusing
structure names and clean up internal.h...). No functional chance and I
can submit cleanup patches to staging as well if doing moves by git...

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 							Pavel
>