[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62147462c38b7764eca3a97405fef536846be034.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 16:35:07 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mchehab+samsung@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add new entry for pidfd api
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 00:32 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 03:10:06PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 21:33 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > > Add me as a maintainer for pidfd stuff. This way we can easily see when
> > > changes come in and people know who to yell at.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > []
> > > @@ -12567,6 +12567,18 @@ F: arch/arm/boot/dts/picoxcell*
[]
> > > +PIDFD API
[]
> > > +K: \b(clone_args|kernel_clone_args)\b
> > > +N: pidfd
> >
> > This one I'd suggest using 2 F: patterns instead
> > as the patterns are more comprehensive and do not
> > use git history when looked up with get_maintainer
>
> Just to clarify, you suggest removing N: pidfd and just leaving in the
> two F: patterns for samples/pidfd and tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/
> below?
>
> > F: samples/pidfd/
> > F: tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists