linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 083/105] ixgbe: Check DDM existence in transceiver before access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190715142839.9896-83-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:28:17 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 083/105] ixgbe: Check DDM existence in transceiver before access

From: "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 655c91414579d7bb115a4f7898ee726fc18e0984 ]

Some transceivers may comply with SFF-8472 but not implement the Digital
Diagnostic Monitoring (DDM) interface described in it. The existence of
such area is specified by bit 6 of byte 92, set to 1 if implemented.

Currently, due to not checking this bit ixgbe fails trying to read SFP
module's eeprom with the follow message:

ethtool -m enP51p1s0f0
Cannot get Module EEPROM data: Input/output error

Because it fails to read the additional 256 bytes in which it was assumed
to exist the DDM data.

This issue was noticed using a Mellanox Passive DAC PN 01FT738. The eeprom
data was confirmed by Mellanox as correct and present in other Passive
DACs in from other manufacturers.

Signed-off-by: "Mauro S. M. Rodrigues" <maurosr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 3 ++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.h     | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
index c3e7a8191128..f7e68083200c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
@@ -3237,7 +3237,8 @@ static int ixgbe_get_module_info(struct net_device *dev,
 		page_swap = true;
 	}
 
-	if (sff8472_rev == IXGBE_SFF_SFF_8472_UNSUP || page_swap) {
+	if (sff8472_rev == IXGBE_SFF_SFF_8472_UNSUP || page_swap ||
+	    !(addr_mode & IXGBE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED)) {
 		/* We have a SFP, but it does not support SFF-8472 */
 		modinfo->type = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079;
 		modinfo->eeprom_len = ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079_LEN;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.h
index b0cac961df3b..94df1d99be95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_phy.h
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
 #define IXGBE_SFF_SOFT_RS_SELECT_10G		0x8
 #define IXGBE_SFF_SOFT_RS_SELECT_1G		0x0
 #define IXGBE_SFF_ADDRESSING_MODE		0x4
+#define IXGBE_SFF_DDM_IMPLEMENTED		0x40
 #define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_DA_ACTIVE_CABLE		0x1
 #define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_DA_PASSIVE_CABLE		0x8
 #define IXGBE_SFF_QSFP_CONNECTOR_NOT_SEPARABLE	0x23
-- 
2.20.1