linux-kernel - [tip:x86/urgent] Revert "x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector" and fix the test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-c7ca0b614513afba57824cae68447f9c32b1ee61@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:17:13 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] Revert "x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing
 the FS/GS selector" and fix the test

Commit-ID:  c7ca0b614513afba57824cae68447f9c32b1ee61
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/c7ca0b614513afba57824cae68447f9c32b1ee61
Author:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 07:21:44 -0700
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:12:31 +0200

Revert "x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector" and fix the test

This reverts commit 48f5e52e916b55fb73754833efbacc7f8081a159.

The ptrace ABI change was a prerequisite to the proposed design for
FSGSBASE.  Since FSGSBASE support has been reverted, and since I'm not
convinced that the ABI was ever adequately tested, revert the ABI change as
well.

This also modifies the test case so that it tests the preexisting behavior.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fca39c478ea7fb15bc76fe8a36bd180810a067f6.1563200250.git.luto@kernel.org

---
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c               | 14 ++++++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c | 22 ++++------------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
index 71691a8310e7..0fdbe89d0754 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -369,12 +369,22 @@ static int putreg(struct task_struct *child,
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,fs_base):
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		x86_fsbase_write_task(child, value);
+		/*
+		 * When changing the FS base, use do_arch_prctl_64()
+		 * to set the index to zero and to set the base
+		 * as requested.
+		 */
+		if (child->thread.fsbase != value)
+			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_FS, value);
 		return 0;
 	case offsetof(struct user_regs_struct,gs_base):
+		/*
+		 * Exactly the same here as the %fs handling above.
+		 */
 		if (value >= TASK_SIZE_MAX)
 			return -EIO;
-		x86_gsbase_write_task(child, value);
+		if (child->thread.gsbase != value)
+			return do_arch_prctl_64(child, ARCH_SET_GS, value);
 		return 0;
 #endif
 	}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
index 5ab4c60c100e..15a329da59fa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c
@@ -489,25 +489,11 @@ static void test_ptrace_write_gsbase(void)
 		 * selector value is changed or not by the GSBASE write in
 		 * a ptracer.
 		 */
-		if (gs != *shared_scratch) {
-			nerrs++;
-			printf("[FAIL]\tGS changed to %lx\n", gs);
-
-			/*
-			 * On older kernels, poking a nonzero value into the
-			 * base would zero the selector.  On newer kernels,
-			 * this behavior has changed -- poking the base
-			 * changes only the base and, if FSGSBASE is not
-			 * available, this may have no effect.
-			 */
-			if (gs == 0)
-				printf("\tNote: this is expected behavior on older kernels.\n");
-		} else if (have_fsgsbase && (base != 0xFF)) {
-			nerrs++;
-			printf("[FAIL]\tGSBASE changed to %lx\n", base);
+		if (gs == 0 && base == 0xFF) {
+			printf("[OK]\tGS was reset as expected\n");
 		} else {
-			printf("[OK]\tGS remained 0x%hx%s", *shared_scratch, have_fsgsbase ? " and GSBASE changed to 0xFF" : "");
-			printf("\n");
+			nerrs++;
+			printf("[FAIL]\tGS=0x%lx, GSBASE=0x%lx (should be 0, 0xFF)\n", gs, base);
 		}
 	}