[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1907152333300.5700@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:39:52 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/2] ipvs: batch __ip_vs_cleanup
Hello,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> It's better to batch __ip_vs_cleanup to speedup ipvs
> connections dismantle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip_vs.h | 2 +-
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
> index 3759167..93e7a25 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
> @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static inline void ip_vs_control_del(struct ip_vs_conn *cp)
> void ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs);
> void ip_vs_estimator_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs);
> void ip_vs_sync_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs);
> -void ip_vs_service_net_cleanup(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs);
> +void ip_vs_service_nets_cleanup(struct list_head *net_list);
>
> /* IPVS application functions
> * (from ip_vs_app.c)
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> index 46f06f9..b4d79b7 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
> @@ -2402,18 +2402,23 @@ static int __net_init __ip_vs_init(struct net *net)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> -static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup(struct net *net)
> +static void __net_exit __ip_vs_cleanup_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
> {
> - struct netns_ipvs *ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
> -
> - ip_vs_service_net_cleanup(ipvs); /* ip_vs_flush() with locks */
> - ip_vs_conn_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> - ip_vs_app_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> - ip_vs_protocol_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> - ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> - ip_vs_estimator_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> - IP_VS_DBG(2, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen);
> - net->ipvs = NULL;
> + struct netns_ipvs *ipvs;
> + struct net *net;
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> +
> + ip_vs_service_nets_cleanup(net_list); /* ip_vs_flush() with locks */
> + list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
How much faster is to replace list_for_each_entry in
ops_exit_list() with this one. IPVS can waste time in calls
such as kthread_stop() and del_timer_sync() but I'm not sure
we can solve it easily. What gain do you see in benchmarks?
> + ipvs = net_ipvs(net);
> + ip_vs_conn_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> + ip_vs_app_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> + ip_vs_protocol_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> + ip_vs_control_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> + ip_vs_estimator_net_cleanup(ipvs);
> + IP_VS_DBG(2, "ipvs netns %d released\n", ipvs->gen);
> + net->ipvs = NULL;
> + }
> }
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists