[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190715152255.027e2e368e16eb0a862eb9df@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:22:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...nel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 0/2] mm: mempolicy: fix mbind()'s inconsistent
behavior for unmovable pages
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 08:20:07 +0800 Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Changelog
> v2: * Fixed the inconsistent behavior by not aborting !vma_migratable()
> immediately by a separate patch (patch 1/2), and this is also the
> preparation for patch 2/2. For the details please see the commit
> log. Per Vlastimil.
> * Not abort immediately if unmovable page is met. This should handle
> non-LRU movable pages and temporary off-LRU pages more friendly.
> Per Vlastimil and Michal Hocko.
>
> Yang Shi (2):
> mm: mempolicy: make the behavior consistent when MPOL_MF_MOVE* and MPOL_MF_STRICT were specified
> mm: mempolicy: handle vma with unmovable pages mapped correctly in mbind
>
I'm seeing no evidence of review on these two. Could we please take a
look? 2/2 fixes a kernel crash so let's please also think about the
-stable situation.
I have a note here that Vlastimil had an issue with [1/2] but I seem to
hae misplaced that email :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists