[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6166ec9ce99e5af2721793eaf4a769aaa881e14d.1563150885.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 19:37:02 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/22] x86/uaccess: Remove ELF function annotation from copy_user_handle_tail()
After an objtool improvement, it's complaining about the CLAC in
copy_user_handle_tail():
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x12: redundant UACCESS disable
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o: warning: objtool: copy_user_handle_tail()+0x6: (alt)
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o: warning: objtool: copy_user_handle_tail()+0x2: (alt)
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o: warning: objtool: copy_user_handle_tail()+0x0: <=== (func)
copy_user_handle_tail() is incorrectly marked as a callable function, so
objtool is rightfully concerned about the CLAC with no corresponding
STAC.
Remove the ELF function annotation. The copy_user_handle_tail() code
path is already verified by objtool because it's jumped to by other
callable asm code (which does the corresponding STAC).
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S
index 378a1f70ae7d..4fe1601dbc5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ copy_user_handle_tail:
ret
_ASM_EXTABLE_UA(1b, 2b)
-ENDPROC(copy_user_handle_tail)
+END(copy_user_handle_tail)
/*
* copy_user_nocache - Uncached memory copy with exception handling
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists