linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:25:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>
cc:     thomas.lendacky@....com, bhe@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lijiang@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to
 be reserved

On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

> That build failure is from the current tip of Linus's tree
> 
> If the fix is in, then it hasn't fixed the issue

Sorry, my bad. There was a very similar issue and I confused the two:

  013c66edf207 ("Revert "x86/build: Move _etext to actual end of .text"")

The reverted commit caused a build fail with gold as well. Let me stare at
your issue.

Thanks,

	tglx