[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190715102508.32434-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:25:05 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...riel.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] sched/fair: Init NUMA task_work in sched_fork()
A TODO has been sitting in task_tick_numa() regarding init'ing the
task_numa_work() task_work in sched_fork() rather than in task_tick_numa(),
so I figured I'd have a go at it.
Patches 1 & 2 do that, and patch 3 is a freebie cleanup.
Briefly tested on a 2 * (Xeon E5-2690) system, didn't see any obvious
breakage.
Valentin Schneider (3):
sched/fair: Move init_numa_balancing() below task_numa_work()
sched/fair: Move task_numa_work() init to init_numa_balancing()
sched/fair: Change task_numa_work() storage to static
kernel/sched/fair.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists