[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190715104828.GD3419@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:48:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, mgorman@...e.de,
riel@...riel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched/fair: Init NUMA task_work in sched_fork()
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:25:05AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> A TODO has been sitting in task_tick_numa() regarding init'ing the
> task_numa_work() task_work in sched_fork() rather than in task_tick_numa(),
> so I figured I'd have a go at it.
>
> Patches 1 & 2 do that, and patch 3 is a freebie cleanup.
>
> Briefly tested on a 2 * (Xeon E5-2690) system, didn't see any obvious
> breakage.
>
> Valentin Schneider (3):
> sched/fair: Move init_numa_balancing() below task_numa_work()
> sched/fair: Move task_numa_work() init to init_numa_balancing()
> sched/fair: Change task_numa_work() storage to static
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists