[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c54077a4-3aae-c95c-8491-db5f05b0305c@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:19:35 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: zhang.lyra@...il.com, orsonzhai@...il.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: sdhci: Fix the incorrect soft reset operation
when runtime resuming
On 15/07/19 1:58 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> In sdhci_runtime_resume_host() function, we will always do software reset
> for all, but according to the specification, we should issue reset command
> and reinitialize the SD/eMMC card.
Where does it say that?
> However, we only do reinitialize the
> SD/eMMC card when the SD/eMMC card are power down during runtime suspend.
>
> Thus for those platforms that do not power down the SD/eMMC card during
> runtime suspend, we should not do software reset for all.
> To fix this
> issue, we can add one condition to validate the MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM
> to decide if we can do software reset for all or just reset command
> and data lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 9715834..470c5e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -3333,7 +3333,7 @@ int sdhci_runtime_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> host->ops->enable_dma(host);
> }
>
> - sdhci_init(host, 0);
> + sdhci_init(host, !(mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM));
We have done a full reset for a long time, so it would be surprising to need
to change it.
What problem is it causing?
>
> if (mmc->ios.power_mode != MMC_POWER_UNDEFINED &&
> mmc->ios.power_mode != MMC_POWER_OFF) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists