[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190715141809.8445-50-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 10:16:21 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 050/158] net: sfp: add mutex to prevent concurrent state checks
From: Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>
[ Upstream commit 2158e856f56bb762ef90f3ec244d41a519826f75 ]
sfp_check_state can potentially be called by both a threaded IRQ handler
and delayed work. If it is concurrently called, it could result in
incorrect state management. Add a st_mutex to protect the state - this
lock gets taken outside of code that checks and handle state changes, and
the existing sm_mutex nests inside of it.
Suggested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancock@...systems.ca>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 8807a806cc47..418522aa2f71 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -185,10 +185,11 @@ struct sfp {
struct gpio_desc *gpio[GPIO_MAX];
bool attached;
+ struct mutex st_mutex; /* Protects state */
unsigned int state;
struct delayed_work poll;
struct delayed_work timeout;
- struct mutex sm_mutex;
+ struct mutex sm_mutex; /* Protects state machine */
unsigned char sm_mod_state;
unsigned char sm_dev_state;
unsigned short sm_state;
@@ -1718,6 +1719,7 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
{
unsigned int state, i, changed;
+ mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
state = sfp_get_state(sfp);
changed = state ^ sfp->state;
changed &= SFP_F_PRESENT | SFP_F_LOS | SFP_F_TX_FAULT;
@@ -1743,6 +1745,7 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
sfp_sm_event(sfp, state & SFP_F_LOS ?
SFP_E_LOS_HIGH : SFP_E_LOS_LOW);
rtnl_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&sfp->st_mutex);
}
static irqreturn_t sfp_irq(int irq, void *data)
@@ -1773,6 +1776,7 @@ static struct sfp *sfp_alloc(struct device *dev)
sfp->dev = dev;
mutex_init(&sfp->sm_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&sfp->st_mutex);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sfp->poll, sfp_poll);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&sfp->timeout, sfp_timeout);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists