[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190716080610.GE12715@pdeschrijver-desktop.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:06:10 +0300
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>
CC: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<jason@...edaemon.net>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <stefan@...er.ch>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<jckuo@...dia.com>, <talho@...dia.com>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mperttunen@...dia.com>, <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/18] clk: tegra210: Add support for Tegra210 clocks
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:24:26PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
> > OK, Will add to CPUFreq driver...
> > >
> > > The other thing that also need attention is that T124 CPUFreq driver
> > > implicitly relies on DFLL driver to be probed first, which is icky.
> > >
> > Should I add check for successful dfll clk register explicitly in
> > CPUFreq driver probe and defer till dfll clk registers?
>
> Sorry, I didn't follow the mail thread. Just regarding the DFLL part.
>
> As you know it, the DFLL clock is one of the CPU clock sources and
> integrated with DVFS control logic with the regulator. We will not switch
> CPU to other clock sources once we switched to DFLL. Because the CPU has
> been regulated by the DFLL HW with the DVFS table (CVB or OPP table you see
> in the driver.). We shouldn't reparent it to other sources with unknew
> freq/volt pair. That's not guaranteed to work. We allow switching to
> open-loop mode but different sources.
>
> And I don't exactly understand why we need to switch to PLLP in CPU idle
> driver. Just keep it on CL-DVFS mode all the time.
>
> In SC7 entry, the dfll suspend function moves it the open-loop mode. That's
> all. The sc7-entryfirmware will handle the rest of the sequence to turn off
> the CPU power.
>
> In SC7 resume, the warmboot code will handle the sequence to turn on
> regulator and power up the CPU cluster. And leave it on PLL_P. After
> resuming to the kernel, we re-init DFLL, restore the CPU clock policy (CPU
> runs on DFLL open-loop mode) and then moving to close-loop mode.
>
> The DFLL part looks good to me. BTW, change the patch subject to "Add
> suspend-resume support" seems more appropriate to me.
>
To clarify this, the sequences for DFLL use are as follows (assuming all
required DFLL hw configuration has been done)
Switch to DFLL:
0) Save current parent and frequency
1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
2) Enable DFLL
3) Change cclk_g parent to DFLL
For OVR regulator:
4) Change PWM output pin from tristate to output
5) Enable DFLL PWM output
For I2C regulator:
4) Enable DFLL I2C output
6) Program DFLL to closed loop mode
Switch away from DFLL:
0) Change cclk_g parent to PLLP so the CPU frequency is ok for any vdd_cpu voltage
1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
For OVR regulator:
2) Change PWM output pin from output to tristate: vdd_cpu will go back
to hardwired boot voltage.
3) Disable DFLL PWM output
For I2C regulator:
2) Program vdd_cpu regulator voltage to the boot voltage
3) Disable DFLL I2C output
4) Reprogram parent saved in step 0 of 'Switch to DFLL' to the saved
frequency
5) Change cclk_g parent to saved parent
6) Disable DFLL
Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists