[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee011ef9-fe02-8fea-b34d-cb7628abac19@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:10:15 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/24] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: Remove call to memset
after dmam_alloc_coherent
On 7/16/2019 7:35 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 15/07/2019 16:17, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 7/15/2019 1:43 AM, Fuqian Huang wrote:
>>> Should I rewrite the commit log? Just mention that dma_alloc_coherent
>>> has already
>>> zeroed the memory and not to reference the commit?
>>
>> I'd like to hear from Robin Murphy that arm smmu driver follows this as
>> well.
>
> I'd be lying if I said it did.
>
> ...but only because that's never been part of the SMMU driver's
> responsibility either way. The iommu-dma layer however, and thus the
> respective arm64 iommu_dma_ops, has always zeroed allocations right from
> its inception.
>
> 518a2f1925c3 was just cleaning up the last of the stragglers which
> *weren't* already clearing buffers anyway, such that we could formalise
> that behaviour into the API.
Thanks for confirming the behavior for arm64 arch.
Acked-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists