Message-ID: <72b5df8c-8acb-d0d0-ebcf-b406e8404973@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:50:38 -0700
From:   Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>
CC:     <thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        <marc.zyngier@....com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <stefan@...er.ch>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <jckuo@...dia.com>,
        <talho@...dia.com>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
        <spatra@...dia.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/18] clk: tegra210: Add support for Tegra210 clocks


On 7/16/19 8:00 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 16.07.2019 11:06, Peter De Schrijver пишет:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 03:24:26PM +0800, Joseph Lo wrote:
>>>> OK, Will add to CPUFreq driver...
>>>>> The other thing that also need attention is that T124 CPUFreq driver
>>>>> implicitly relies on DFLL driver to be probed first, which is icky.
>>>>>
>>>> Should I add check for successful dfll clk register explicitly in
>>>> CPUFreq driver probe and defer till dfll clk registers?
> Probably you should use the "device links". See [1][2] for the example.
>
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.2.1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c#L2383
>
> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/driver-api/device_link.html
>
> Return EPROBE_DEFER instead of EINVAL if device_link_add() fails. And
> use of_find_device_by_node() to get the DFLL's device, see [3].
>
> [3]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/devfreq/tegra20-devfreq.c#n100
Will go thru and add...
>>> Sorry, I didn't follow the mail thread. Just regarding the DFLL part.
>>>
>>> As you know it, the DFLL clock is one of the CPU clock sources and
>>> integrated with DVFS control logic with the regulator. We will not switch
>>> CPU to other clock sources once we switched to DFLL. Because the CPU has
>>> been regulated by the DFLL HW with the DVFS table (CVB or OPP table you see
>>> in the driver.). We shouldn't reparent it to other sources with unknew
>>> freq/volt pair. That's not guaranteed to work. We allow switching to
>>> open-loop mode but different sources.
> Okay, then the CPUFreq driver will have to enforce DFLL freq to PLLP's
> rate before switching to PLLP in order to have a proper CPU voltage.

PLLP freq is safe to work for any CPU voltage. So no need to enforce 
DFLL freq to PLLP rate before changing CCLK_G source to PLLP during suspend

>>> And I don't exactly understand why we need to switch to PLLP in CPU idle
>>> driver. Just keep it on CL-DVFS mode all the time.
>>>
>>> In SC7 entry, the dfll suspend function moves it the open-loop mode. That's
>>> all. The sc7-entryfirmware will handle the rest of the sequence to turn off
>>> the CPU power.
>>>
>>> In SC7 resume, the warmboot code will handle the sequence to turn on
>>> regulator and power up the CPU cluster. And leave it on PLL_P. After
>>> resuming to the kernel, we re-init DFLL, restore the CPU clock policy (CPU
>>> runs on DFLL open-loop mode) and then moving to close-loop mode.
> The DFLL is re-inited after switching CCLK to DFLL parent during of the
> early clocks-state restoring by CaR driver. Hence instead of having odd
> hacks in the CaR driver, it is much nicer to have a proper
> suspend-resume sequencing of the device drivers. In this case CPUFreq
> driver is the driver that enables DFLL and switches CPU to that clock
> source, which means that this driver is also should be responsible for
> management of the DFLL's state during of suspend/resume process. If
> CPUFreq driver disables DFLL during suspend and re-enables it during
> resume, then looks like the CaR driver hacks around DFLL are not needed.
>
>>> The DFLL part looks good to me. BTW, change the patch subject to "Add
>>> suspend-resume support" seems more appropriate to me.
>>>
>> To clarify this, the sequences for DFLL use are as follows (assuming all
>> required DFLL hw configuration has been done)
>>
>> Switch to DFLL:
>> 0) Save current parent and frequency
>> 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
>> 2) Enable DFLL
>> 3) Change cclk_g parent to DFLL
>> For OVR regulator:
>> 4) Change PWM output pin from tristate to output
>> 5) Enable DFLL PWM output
>> For I2C regulator:
>> 4) Enable DFLL I2C output
>> 6) Program DFLL to closed loop mode
>>
>> Switch away from DFLL:
>> 0) Change cclk_g parent to PLLP so the CPU frequency is ok for any vdd_cpu voltage
>> 1) Program DFLL to open loop mode
>>
>> For OVR regulator:
>> 2) Change PWM output pin from output to tristate: vdd_cpu will go back
>>     to hardwired boot voltage.
>> 3) Disable DFLL PWM output
>>
>> For I2C regulator:
>> 2) Program vdd_cpu regulator voltage to the boot voltage
>> 3) Disable DFLL I2C output
>>
>> 4) Reprogram parent saved in step 0 of 'Switch to DFLL' to the saved
>>     frequency
>> 5) Change cclk_g parent to saved parent
>> 6) Disable DFLL

This is the same sequence currently implemented. But dfll suspend/resume 
calls are thru Tegra210 clock driver.

Dmitry wants to have dfll suspend/resume along with CCLK_G restore to 
happen from CPUFreq driver pm_ops rather than tegra210 clock driver or 
tegra dfll driver.

Will move it to CPUFreq driver...

> Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists