lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 16 Jul 2019 10:03:59 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Deepak Sharma <deepak.sharma@....com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/vgem: use normal cached mmap'ings

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:01 AM Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Quoting Rob Clark (2019-07-16 17:42:15)
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> >
> > Since there is no real device associated with vgem, it is impossible to
> > end up with appropriate dev->dma_ops, meaning that we have no way to
> > invalidate the shmem pages allocated by vgem.  So, at least on platforms
> > without drm_cflush_pages(), we end up with corruption when cache lines
> > from previous usage of vgem bo pages get evicted to memory.
> >
> > The only sane option is to use cached mappings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Possibly we could dma_sync_*_for_{device,cpu}() on dmabuf attach/detach,
> > although the ->gem_prime_{pin,unpin}() API isn't quite ideal for that as
> > it is.  And that doesn't really help for drivers that don't attach/
> > detach for each use.
> >
> > But AFAICT vgem is mainly used for dmabuf testing, so maybe we don't
> > need to care too much about use of cached mmap'ings.
>
> Sadly this regresses with i915 interop.
>
> Starting subtest: 4KiB-tiny-vgem-blt-early-read-child
> (gem_concurrent_blit:8309) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function dmabuf_cmp_bo, file ../tests/i915/gem_concurrent_all.c:408:
> (gem_concurrent_blit:8309) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: v[((y)*(b->width) + (((y) + pass)%(b->width)))] == val
> (gem_concurrent_blit:8309) CRITICAL: error: 0 != 0xdeadbeef
>
> and igt/prime_vgem
>
> Can you please cc intel-gfx so CI can pick up these changes?
> -Chris

I suppose CI is actually reading the imported VGEM bo from GPU?  I can
try to wire up the attach/detach dma_sync, which might help..

BR,
-R

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ