[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190716185218.GB15080@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:52:18 -0400
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild: Fail if gold linker is detected
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The gold linker has known issues of failing the build in random and
> > > > predictible ways. H.J. stated:
> > >
> > > s/predictable/unpredictable?
> >
> > No. It fails randomly, but also predictable. Enable X32 support on 64bit
> > and it fails the VDSO build. That's been the case for years.
>
> Then please make this a bit more apparent, such as:
>
> "The gold linker has known issues of failing the build in random
> but also in more predictible ways."
<bikeshedding>
How about:
The gold linker has known issues of failing for certain configurations.
</bikeshedding>
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists