[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49462c78-f0ad-cb18-7cc7-2a3ce20c7006@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 06:15:30 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
FengTang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
PavelMachek <pavel@....cz>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/paravirt: Drop {read,write}_cr8() hooks
On 15.07.19 17:16, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There is a lot of infrastructure for functionality which is used
> exclusively in __{save,restore}_processor_state() on the suspend/resume
> path.
>
> cr8 is an alias of APIC_TASKPRI, and APIC_TASKPRI is saved/restored by
> lapic_{suspend,resume}(). Saving and restoring cr8 independently of the
> rest of the Local APIC state isn't a clever thing to be doing.
>
> Delete the suspend/resume cr8 handling, which shrinks the size of struct
> saved_context, and allows for the removal of both PVOPS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists